How’s that for an HR pickle?

I’m all for safe transit but I think that this is carrying things a bit too far and I wonder if there is a less evasive way to screen for drug abuse?  I have to believe that a royal lineage or hair sample would accomplish the same result with a lot less humiliation.  I call to mind back in college, when physic testing was relatively commencing, we had to do an in class exercise where we had to empty a cup of water into any one the "yes we would carry a drug test to get a job" or "no, we would not take a physic test to get a job".  At that time, the "yes" category won, hand’s down.  And, I suspect that it would win today admitting that we did the same exercise.

I’m not advocating the removal of remedy testing for transit workers nor am I saying we shouldn’t go on foot to extra mile to make indisputable that the sample we are collecting is verily the worker’s pattern.  What I am dictum is that I think this policy is starting to generate a bit invasive.  Already, we as Americans are giving up so numerous company of our civil liberties in the name of "homeland security".  Are we also going to give away our right to pee in private?

Let’s change the test to one that doesn’face to face require a urine example.  Just a quick blood draw instead.  And, while we’re at it, we can test for cholesterol level and diabetes.  They can get a three-for-one.

What grant you reason?  Want to read the article?  Click here.  Want to hire better in the first place?  Click here.

??? ???? ??????? ?? ????????? ??????

Мой блог находят по следующим фразам