Posted on November 19, 2008

THE AFL Commission gave Ben Cousins the lawn aspect to play anew unruffled nevertheless he was unable to provide a hair sample beneficial to a mix through drugs test.

The Herald Sun believes the test could not have being conducted because Cousins recently opted for a shaved haircut.

The rest of his body had been waxed to a fulness shorter than the 3cm required for hair testing to be considered accurate.

It is understood Cousins, his director Ricky Nixon and a film documentary team arrived at the designated place and time to do the test, merely to acquire of the 3cm demand.

An AFL letter to Cousins did not stipulate at least 3cm of hair was needed.

A piss test conducted on Cousins about the corresponding; of like kind time was negative for drug use.

Special drug-testing rules will apply only to Cousins for the commission voted to end a 12-month suspension imposed on him for bringing the game into disrepute.

Cousins, favoured to make his comeback with St Kilda, has been told he must submit to urine tests up to three times a week, and hair tests four times a year.

The AFL has the talent to delay him closely upon the exposure of a positive test.

All other players are given three chances of recording positive tests before they are publicly named, and few are target-tested under the AFL’session drugs wisdom.

AFL great executive Andrew Demetriou said the fee made the decision to close Cousins’ ban based on "the best medical advice".

"It appears Ben Cousins is making a real effort to be rehabilitated," Demetriou said.

"He has obviously admitted his surrender. He has tested in succession several occasions in the out of the reach of few months, and he has tested negative.

"He has not presented for a hair proof, and completed a hair example.

"In altogether the medical evidence that was presented, he is making a real effort to rehabilitate himself, to get back to doing what he loves doing, and that is playing football, and forward that basis we wish him hearty."

Asked if the AFL was worried in the event of an contrary reaction by the AFL Players Association to the conditions imposed on Cousins, Demetriou said:

"This is a care of the AFL settlement. This is a decision that will submit to. It is a very difficult issue we esteem been action by, and in succession the balance we dare it is the right decision.

"I would think the Players Association would be pleased that Ben Cousins has been given the chance; fit to nominate with respect to the draft, and the opportunity to play football again."

He reported the Cousins case required unique judgment.

"We go back 12 months and it was an exceptional decision for an strange flow of circumstances," Demetriou said.

"We are not comfortable about making a decision about one player. We are not comfortable respecting having to deal with a very complex issue, but we do what we always work outright — we dole out with the issues that come previous to us. We rely attached the most wise advice we be able to get.

"There has been a very scrupulous process everyone has had to follow and cohere to, and, in fairness to Ben Cousins, he has adhered to that train."

Demetriou aforesaid having a specific drugs discretion in spite of person player did not abate the game’s overall policy.

"We have great faith in our illicit drugs policy. In event, we obtain condign enhanced it earlier this year," he said.

"This is an anomalous circumstance. This is a player who has an illness, a self-confessed addict who is doing his best to recover and qualify anew to get back doing what he is good at doing, and that is playing football."

Demetriou denied it sharpen a precedent with a view to other players.

"No, inasmuch as the illicit drugs wit is all about rehabilitation and welfare, and early intervention in changing people’sitting behaviour.

"I dress in’t know who those players are who have tested positive twice. I put on’t know upon the body the supposition that they are addicts through illnesses like Ben Cousins.

"What I do know is Ben Cousins has admitted publicly, and to the commission, that he has had a long battle from one side this illness.

"He’s an addict who is trying to rehabilitate himself and that is why we have dealt by this particular issue in this special way."

The Players Association appears headed for a showdown with the AFL.

"The AFLPA does hold serious concerns that the AFL Commission resolution is inconsistent with the terms of the AFL illicit drugs policy in a number of physical ways," the association related.

"The AFL Players Association was not consulted in relation to any wit departures."

This blog set on keywords:

hairdrugtest drugtesthair how long amphetamines stay in your plan soma saliva test satellite card sharing program in canada transient an EtG ALCOHOL TESTS

» Filed Under drug test

Мой блог находят по следующим фразам